Irrigation Water and Alkalinity in Potted Roses

by Carolyn Elgar, Master Rosarian, Orange County Rose Society

This is a 2020 AOM winner

Ann Boleyn, courtesy David Austin

Most experienced rosarians know about the impacts of pH on nutrient availability in the soil. But what about the quality of your irrigation water? It has its own pH; plants can be negatively affected when its pH is extreme, 4.0 and below or 10.0 and above. Acceptable levels for plants of pH in irrigation water are between 5.5 and 7.5. Roses do best in soils at levels of 6.0 to 6.5, a slightly acidic soil. What impact does high pH of your water have on your soil pH levels?

For roses in the ground, there are many mitigating factors that temper the pH level of water, and there is more space for the water to dissipate and spread. But potted plants grow in confined soil where the buffering protection is limited. Everything that goes into the pot will have a more intensified effect on your plants as space in the pot is limited.

Water alkalinity

However, the alkalinity of your irrigation water is even more important to consider than its pH. Alkalinity in this case does not refer to pH levels; rather it is determined by the amounts of calcium, magnesium, or sodium bicarbonate in the water. These amounts will affect the overall pH, but their excess is what changes your potted plants soil. Here alkalinity is a concentration of several ions, such as calcium, magnesium, or sodium bicarbonate.

The effect of soil that is highly alkaline on rose plants in pots is similar to the effect of high alkaline soils in your garden. Important nutrients such as iron, manganese, and zinc become unavailable. Plant growth may be stunted, and leaf tips turn yellow and burn because of the high salt contents. Overall chlorosis (yellowing) may occur; manganese is important in chlorophyll production, the process that keeps leaves green.

The environment where your water originates is one of the biggest influences on its alkalinity. Mountainous areas and rocky soils are high in mineral content. Water draining from these areas absorbs these minerals and enters treatment plants at high alkaline levels, especially where there is little rainfall. Rain leaches minerals from the soil and tends to have an acidifying effect, resulting in water with less alkalinity. But in arid areas, minerals build up in the soil; the water that passes through these soils will pick up minerals, increasing alkaline levels.

Water analysis

In a water sample, all the ions that make up its alkalinity are combined and reported as calcium carbonate, CaCO3, the main component of lime. The ideal range for total alkalinity is 30-100 mg/L, but levels up to 150 mg/L are acceptable. High alkalinity (over 150 mg/L) can result in high pH in water; high alkalinity and high pH can cause problems with nutrient deficiencies or imbalances. In addition, high levels of these salts can result in soil impaction, water absorption, and plant health.

How can you determine the alkalinity of your irrigation water? Most water districts publish an annual report that details the components of your water. Some of these components are legally regulated by Maximum Containment Levels, such as fluoride and aluminum. Minerals such as calcium, potassium, and sodium are not regulated, but their quantities are usually included, along with a measure of water hardness, which is determined by the amounts of CaCO3 in parts per million. Akalinity is measured the same way.

In this sample, the District of Southern California water district reports alkalinity ranges from 69-74 parts per million, while hardness ranges from 124- 130 parts per million. Levels of pH are at 8.4 to 8.5. The water from this district could be considered to be hard and high in alkalinity as well as pH levels.

In contrast, the Trabuco Canyon Water District shows a pH of 6.9, alkalinity levels of 144 parts per million, and hardness of 200 parts per million. Here is an example of a lower pH level despite the higher alkaline amounts. The Trabuco Canyon Water district is located at the foot of the Santa Ana mountains, where the soil is full of the rocks eroded from the mountainsides. This results in hard water, water that will leave mineral deposits in pipes and on fixtures.

A research paper from University of Massachusetts Amherst, published in October of this year, details the upper and lower limits of irrigation alkalinity in container soils.

Container Minimum alkalinity Maximum alkalinity parts per million CaCO3 parts per million CaCO3

Seedlings or plugs 37.5 65

Small pots/shallow flats 37.5 85

4-5 inch pots/shallow flats 37.5 105

6 inch pots/long term crops 37.5 130

Using these standards, one can see that the Trabuco Canyon alkalinity levels of 144 ppm indicates water with a high amount of minerals. Potting soil with a large amount of peat would be helpful here.

Looking at the chart above, it is obvious that alkalinity in water will have particular impact on seedlings or plugs of baby plants. Distilled water may be a better choice for them.

While there’s not much you can do to change the chemical makeup of your water, you can help alleviate its impact. Potting soils high in peat content will offer some buffer; peat is acidic in nature. Fertilizers acidify soil, but nitrates leach out and leave minerals behind. Flushing pots completely with water every three to six months will dissolve minerals and also diminish salts in the potting medium. Using a solution of 1/2 to 2 tablespoons of vinegar in one gallon of water will raise acid levels in the soil. The type of vinegar is important; apple cider and white vinegar seldom exceed five to ten percent strength and are less likely to damage plants. Flushing solutions such as Clearex can be used to drench the pot until there is 20-40% runoff from the bottom of the pot.

Determining alkalinity levels of the water you use is hard to do without a water report. A hand held pH meter may show high pH levels when you test your pot with it, but alkalinity can occur at lower pH measurements. However, if the soil has a high pH level, you can be certain it is not too acid. Based on your knowledge of your water contents and the high pH reading, trying some measures to reduce salts and alkalinity in your potted roses won’t make your soil too acid.

 

Smart Phones, Smart Cars….Why Not Smart Pots? Container Design Effects Plant Development

by Gaye Hammond, Master Rosarian, Houston Rose Society

This article is an AOM winner

 

Root deformation and heat saturation of planting media are common challenges associated with growing roses and other plants in a container – whether you are a commercial producer or a rose grower. A strong root mass means a strong plant and a strong plant is more resistant to insects, disease, weather fluctuations and is easier to care for overall.

Advances in technologies are helping address and overcome these challenges. Researchers at the University of Florence (Italy) have studied the effect of container design on long term plant health and their findings are very interesting. Plants grown for a long period in smooth-sided plastic pots result in deformed root systems. This happens because lateral roots are prevented from the normal horizontal growth pattern, contact the sides of the container, turn and begin to circle the root ball or the roots grow vertically to the bottom of the container and then begin to circle.

 

Some refer to this as the plant being “root bound” or “girdled.” Kurt Reiger at High Caliper Growing explains, “In plastic, roots circle the outside of the soil mass and leave a blank space in the middle. We are root specialists. Plants perform much better when they have a fuller, more complete and defined root structure. This is especially important for plants from which cuttings will be taken (like roses).” Circling roots that form at the bottom of the container usually fail to change direction and grow into the soil profile when transplanted. Eventually reduced root growth and continued root deformation impacts the overall vigor of the plant.

Mechanical intervention by making cuts on the root ball periphery or splitting and splaying the bottom third of the root mass are two common strategies for dealing with “root bound” plants. However, both strategies can cause transplant shock of already stressed plants. Correcting a malformed root system is critical to the long term health of a rose, especially hybridizers working with new seedlings.

 

The evolution of container designs intended to reduce deformation run the gamut of options from disrupting smooth container walls by inserting ridges; coating the inside of the container with a root-growth inhibitor; injecting root-inhibiting chemicals directly into the plastic before the container is formed and/or using woven plastic strands formed to shape that, in effect, cause roots to be air-pruned once they emerge into open air.

 

By testing panoply of container designs, scientists found that traditional smooth-sided containers produced and highest percentage of deformed roots when compared to plants grown in containers with air-pruning or mechanical impediments.

 

A solution to these challenges literally dropped into my arms at the Texas Nursery & Landscape Association Exposition several years ago. That year, I saved a display of Smart Pots™ (High Caliper Growing, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma) from tipping over and for coming to the product’s rescue went home with a Smart Pot™. The company representative suggested I walk through the trade floor and take note of how many of the fully grown trees at the Expo had been planted in these patented fabric pots. I was impressed.

 

Research has been done by Dr. Michael Arnold and Dr. Garry McDonald at Texas A&M University on the use of Smart Pots™ to reduce root deformation of container-grown Knock Out® Roses. According to Dr. Arnold, “Root deformation in the form of deflected roots at the container wall is an inherent problem associated with limited root volume of a container that leads to circling or kinked roots that may persist when plants are transplanted to either larger containers or in the landscape.” Dr. Arnold found that the use of Smart Pots™ decreased root deformation and circling of container-grown rose roots by five times and also doubled the size of the root mass compared to traditional plastic containers.

In a Smart Pot™, when a root tip reaches the side of the fabric container, it stops in place and initiates lateral or side-branching. As the process repeats itself, the entire area of the container is filled with fibrous root growth, allowing more surface area for mineral and water absorption.

 

Root architecture problems are not the only limitation when it comes to container-grown plants. Increased temperatures in the root zones, due to reflected radiant heat from gravel, concrete or other surfaces, together with container design materials can also negatively affect plant roots. According to the University of Illinois, dark colored, metal and black plastic containers develop the highest root zone temperatures.

Drs. Arnold and McDonald also found that the root balls of plants in Smart Pots™ were noticeably cooler and moister to the touch compared to those in black plastic containers, suggesting that evaporative cooling may be the cause of the reduced temperatures. With an outside ambient atmospheric temperature of a whopping 106° F roses grown in black plastic pots had a substrate temperature of 130.8° F, while plants in Smart Pots™ had substrate temperatures more than 33° cooler (97.4° F).

Technology has made us smarter about our pots!

 

Fungicides – What You Need to Know

by Carolyn Elgar, Master Rosarian, Orange County Rose Society

This is a 2020 AOM winner

One constant problem that rose lovers have to deal with when cultivating their favorite flower is that of fungal disease. Powdery mildew, black spot, anthracnose and other leaf spot diseases, and rust are all fungal diseases that have spores that travel easily through the air to spread to other parts of the plant they inhabit or plants nearby. The parts of the fungus that produce the spores are not visible, so these diseases are not obvious until they have germinated and created spores.

Because of this, these diseases have to be addressed before we can actually see them. We do this by using fungicides, sprays that will kill the disease or prevent the spores from spreading. There are many different products available for this, and most of them work all of the previously mentioned diseases. Botrytis and downy mildew have different growth processes and are not usually affected by these fungicides.

Fungicide development history

The first efforts to deal with these plant diseases occurred in the 1600’s when farmers were concerned about the health of their food crops. Initially they used common products such as brine or arsenic; by 1760 the application of copper sulfate was used in seed treatment. In the mid 1800’s sulfur dust, lime sulfur, and finally the Bordeaux solution (a combination of copper sulfate and slaked lime) were used to deal with powdery mildew and other foliar diseases.

In the 1940’s as gardening and landscape plant production gained importance, a synthetically produced compound, chlorothalonil, was found to be a successful way of eradicating fungal diseases. A contact fungicide, it was easier to mix and use. It was widely used in agriculture. However, the incidence of copper contaminating the soil, and the recent exploration into its toxicity for bees and possible carcinogenic properties has led some countries to ban its use. It is still available for sale in the United States.

In the first half of the 20th century other contact fungicides such as the phthalimides (Captan) and the dithiocarbamates (Maneb, Mancozeb) were produced and found to even easier to prepare, more active, and less phytotoxic.

All these early used fungicides were contact fungicides, meaning they were effective only when they physically touched the pathogens. The success of contact products is subject to good plant coverage and consistent reapplication to address new growth and environmental degradation. In addition, these products are multisite, meaning they have a broad, untargeted function that could damage other parts of the plant’s foliage.

In the latter half of the 20th century chemists gained knowledge and experimented with synthetic products. They produced the first systemic fungicide product, the thiabendazoles. Systemic fungicides enter the plant cells rather than stay on the leaf surface. Longer lasting than contact products, most of these products are single site, that is, targeted towards one metabolic pathway of the fungus. The advantage is more effective prevention and less plant damage.

Disease resistance

This brings us to the topic of disease resistance to targeted fungicides. Because only one life process of the fungus is addressed, with consistent use it is possible for a pathogen to develop a genetic work around, avoiding the fungicide’s effects. As the fungicide is repeatedly used, the pathogens that survive its assault reproduce and thrive. The fungicide is no longer useful in protecting the plant. As a result, the first systemics are no longer as effective as they once were.

The first recognized occurrence of resistance to a systemic fungicide was in 1960; however, with the continued development of systemic fungicides, the problem increased. In 1981 the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) was formed to “discuss resistance problems and formulate plans for cooperative efforts to avoid or manage fungicide resistance.” Fungicides were analyzed and grouped by their “mode of action,” the way the products act on fungi.

The chemistry is complicated, but not necessary to understand when using the FRAC group numbers. The goal is to avoid using products with the same mode of action and to alternate between products so to avoid the opportunity for the pathogen to change its genetic code.

At the same time, interest in organic methods increased. The Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) was formed in 1997 to evaluate materials for use in organic agriculture. The OMRI offered certification to substances used in the production of organic food and fiber products. Those who treasure the organic approach to gardening can access the OMRI website and search for products that have been certified. Note that the definition of organic as coming from living things does not apply here as copper and sulfur are both OMRI certified.

Today we have many effective fungicides that use different approaches to fungal infection. Generally, the older products and those that are OMRI certified are contact products. Contact sprays are effective, but they demand a lot from the gardener: complete foliage coverage, repeated application within short periods of time, and possible plant tissue damage. Systemic products are more gardener friendly and less toxic to plants. The most popular systemics today are the DMI fungicides, a group that contains many chemical products such as propiconazole, muyclobutanil, or triforine. They are in FRAC group three and all use the same mode of action. Also popular are the Qol outside inhibitors that include azoxystrobin and trifloxystrobin and are in group 11.

There are several ways to use fungicides in a manner that does not produce pathogen resistance.

• use only low resistance products such as contact fungicides

• alternate between products that have different modes of action

• tank mix two different products with different modes of action, perhaps a systemic and a contact spray

It is important to realize that the names of products are not what’s important; they vary depending on the company that makes them. To further confuse things, the same company may offer different fungicides with different chemical formulations. For example, Bonide Fung-onil contains chlorothalonil, a low resistance contact product, while Bonide Infuse has the active ingredient of propiconazole, a systemic, high resistance risk product. Other brand names such as Monterey and Bayer do the same.

Read the label

This means the consumer must look at the ingredients in a product and know their properties, despite the confusing chemical names. The label has all the information you need to use the product successfully. For example, a contact spray will have to be applied consistently while a systemic one offers more flexibility. Very few products are curative; most have to be applied before you see the fungal spores, the white fuzz of powdery mildew, the black spots of leaf spot disease, or the orange pustules of rust.

In addition, the label will also contain usage amounts, information about whether the product can be tank mixed, and about the health concerns in using the product. All of those products you see at the big box home store have different things in them, and they work differently. A chart included here breaks up fungicides by mode of action and gives information about the properties of products. Brand names are listed, but new products are always being introduced. Some are relatively inexpensive, while others are more expensive, have to be ordered, and are more effective with higher percentages of active ingredients.

Once you get past the intimidating chemical names, and you know what they mean in terms of your spray program. your confidence and your roses’ health will increase.

Fungicide Chart. FRAC and OMRI website.

Winterizing Roses in the North Central District

Lois Ann Helgeson, helge006@gold.tc.umn.edu , Consulting Rosarian, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN

The American Rose Society’s North Central District includes the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and North and South Dakotas, situated in USDA plant hardiness zones 3, 4, and 5. Rose lovers here face a unique set of extreme conditions in which to grow their favorite flower. Temperatures in the winter can drop to -40° F and rise to over 100° F during the summer. The growing season is shorter than that of much of the rest of the country. While there are variations within the different states included in the district and even within the individual states themselves, the first Hybrid Tea roses generally can come into bloom late in May and the growing season is really considered over by the end of October.

In spite of the difficulties placed on us by Mother Nature, people in the upper Midwest successfully grow and enjoy rose varieties from the full range of the available rose classes. Growers wanting to experience the enjoyment of the most tender varieties have learned to protect them from the effects of winter extremes. Often they use a method called the Minnesota Tip which was developed specifically for zone 4.

The Minnesota Tip

It is known that the tender varieties of roses are severely or even fatally damaged at temperatures below approximately 20° F. It was considered imperative to find a method where these lower temperatures could be avoided. In addition there was concern for the late winter/early spring temperature freeze/thaw fluctuations that can also bring damage.

Midwest growers can thank Albert Nelson, an avid local gardener, for the development of the Minnesota Tip method of winter protection for tender roses. Having grown roses since the 1920′s, Nelson was determined to find a better method to winter-over tender roses than what was then being used. In the early 1950′s he heard about local raspberry growers who were tipping their plants and covering them with soil to protect them over winter. About the same time he learned about a lady in Massachusetts who was having some success protecting roses by bending, pegging and covering with evergreen boughs and soil. In 1952 Nelson first tried bending and then half covering roses with soil here in Minnesota. However, it was in 1954, when he bent the roses and totally covered them with soil, that he realized that he had found the right combination. It was to be a significant contribution toward successfully growing tender roses in cold climates.

The process was refined in the next few years to the method used today. In 1966, Jerry Olson and Carl Holst demonstrated the Minnesota Tip at the ARS convention held in Omaha, Nebraska. For that presentation, Jerry Olson and Dorothy Campbell wrote what was the first of the Minnesota Rose Society’s guide sheets on rose care. Charles Campbell named the process the Minnesota Tip.

Procedure

Roses are dormant sprayed in mid to late October at the time when you are doing general fall cleanup. It is recommended that old mulch be removed to control a prime source of disease infection for the following season.

Tie the rose canes together using a synthetic twine that will not decay over winter. This process can be described as lacing up the plant – generally starting from the bottom and working up. It is important to have an extra length of twine either left at the top of the plant or added around the mid section of the tied plant. This will be allowed to extend above the ground to help the gardener locate and lift the plant in the spring.

A trench is dug on one side of the plant and then the soil is loosened all around the plant, using a garden fork to minimize root damage.

The plant is tipped into the trench, using the garden fork, and taking advantage of the plant’s flexibility just under the graft union. With planning, the roses have been planted so that they will bend toward the side where the graft is attached, reducing the chances of breakage.

The plants are covered with the soil that was removed, being careful to leave the end of the extra length of twine exposed.

It is a good idea to water the bed well at this point to help settle the soil and to simply keep the canes and roots in good shape over the winter. Growers understand the importance of summer watering their roses and having rose beds with good drainage, however, the plants can also be stressed if they enter the cold weather season too dry.

As the temperatures drop in early November, a blanket of leaves 12″ – 18″ deep is added. Watering will help keep the leaves from blowing around. An alternative is to simply place bagged leaves on top of the bed. Containers containing rodent bait are tipped on their sides and placed in the leaves or between the bags of leaves.

Early in April the leaves are removed. By the middle of April, the rest of the process is reversed.

Containers

Container grown roses, including trees, can be successfully protected by laying them on their sides and burying them, without removing the plants from their containers. Roses may also be dug and bundled bareroot, and then the bundle buried, much as in the Minnesota Tip. Healthy roses, protected by burying over winter, generally survive with very minimal cane damage. Growers, especially those in the portion of the NCD that lies within zone 5, have found that there are other methods that provide sufficient, successful winter protection.

Zone 3 and 4 growers may not find that these methods provide an acceptable level of protection from winter dieback and damage. Some of these methods are described here.

Additional Methods of Winter Protection

Mounding

The base of tender rose bushes can mounded or hilled with 10″ to 12″ of soil. This is particularly important if the rose is grafted. The bud union is the source of all new cane growth for these plants, and if it is damaged over winter, the plant may be lost. A wire cylinder can be used to help contain the soil. Tall plants can be pruned and tied to prevent whipping in the wind. As with the Minnesota Tip, the roses should be dormant sprayed. The mounded roses are also covered with leaves and containers of rodent bait should be added.

Rose Cones

Roses may be protected using rose cones. The plants are sprayed, tied and pruned to fit inside the cone. Soil and leaves may be added to protect the graft union. If the graft union is below ground level, only leaves may be necessary. Cones with detachable tops are best as they allow the tops to be removed during warm spring days and replaced at night. If the tops are not detachable, four 1″ ventilation holes can be added on the sides near the top. The bottom of the cone should be sealed with dirt and the top weighed down with bricks.

Rose Boxes

A rose bed may be protected by constructing an oversized cold frame or rose house over it. Plants are sprayed and pruned to about 2′ or to fit the rose house. A simple wooden frame is constructed that will hold sheets of building styrofoam that make up the sides. Additional sheets of styrofoam are used as covers for these boxes. In the spring the covers can be slid open during warm days to provide ventilation and closed again at night. The box must be constructed in a manner to insure against the weight of the snow and rain as well as strong winds. In the spring these rose houses are dismantled and stored until the next fall.

Indoors

An alternative method of protecting miniatures – and other container grown roses – is available to those with either an unheated garage or room where there is a reasonable degree of control of the winter temperatures. Keep in mind that most tender roses must be maintained at temperatures above 20 degrees, preferably in the 40s during the winter months. An alternative source of heat may be necessary during extreme cold periods. The potted plants are sprayed, tied and watered. To keep roses from drying out, the pots are placed into plastic garbage bags, two to a bag with the miniatures. The tops of the bags are tied. The bags are placed on pallets or platforms to separate them a few inches from the floor. This method is used by growers in all three growing zones in the North Central District. Some report, as a negative, that plants may respond to warm spring temps and began to grow before it is warm enough to move the pots back outdoors.

Factors in Cold Hardiness

Cold hardiness has three factors – plant acclimation to cold in the fall months, actual mid-winter hardiness and de-acclimation in the spring.

Acclimation in plants takes place in response to shortening day lengths and declining temperatures. Biochemical and physiological changes gradually occur that make plants more cold tolerant. Plants, including the different classes of roses, and the varieties within each of these classes, differ in their ability to make these changes. In fact, this ability can change somewhat from year to year for any particular plant due to changes in plant health and by annual variations in temperature patterns.

Mid-winter hardiness refers to the actual lowest temps that a plant will tolerate, without damage, once it has acclimated during the fall months.

De-acclimation occurs in the late winter and early spring. This basically is a decrease in hardiness in response to warming temperatures. It is a process that is opposite to that of fall acclimation.

Good Health is Important

Plants, including roses, that acclimate too slowly, can be damaged by early cold temps. In an unusual year an early cold snap that occurs before acclimation or hardening off can injure plants that normally are considered winter hardy. A plant weakened by poor health may never reach its normal maximum mid-winter hardiness level and thus may suffer tissue damage at considerably warmer temps than expected. Additionally, plants that deacclimate too rapidly during late winter thaws may suffer damage due to late spring frosts.

To at least some extent, the rose varieties that people choose to grow and the methods that they use to protect them will be influenced by these hardiness factors. The choices will also depend upon how much dieback – and subsequent reduced bloom that follows and in some cases increased risk of plant loss – that a particular grower is willing to accept. This is weighed against the amount of additional work that they might be willing to do in the spring and fall for seasonal protection.

There has been a term coined, dieback hardy, for those roses that generally can be grown with minimal winter protection, that are likely to sustain considerable winter damage, yet are known to be able to regrow the following spring and bloom quite well by June. It should be acknowledged, however, that while this, with certain varieties, is acceptable to most growers, that these same varieties will perform substantially better in the years when there are milder winters and reduced damage. Additionally, growers must understand that healthy plants – of any class and variety – will be better able to survive winter weather using any of the available protection methods. As an example, plants, defoliated by black spot or stunted by heat and water stress, face winter with a significantly reduced chance of survival.

Location Factors

Some marginally hardy varieties can be helped by careful choice of planting location – such as the east side of buildings or in areas where snow accumulates. Some areas are subjected to drying winter winds, and if without reliable natural snow cover, this can inflict additional damage on rose canes. Protection by shrubbery or buildings may create areas where the desiccating effect of the winds is substantially reduced. In my yard, the city snowplows push snow around the fence bordering a long perennial bed near the street providing the necessary additional protection for a number of Hybrid Perpetuals. Most years these, otherwise zone 4 marginal plants, have experienced little dieback and reward me with outstanding bloom.

Watering

Hardiness can also be improved by fall watering. Additionally, stopping nitrogen fertilizers and discontinuing deadheading after August will encourage the hardening off, or maturing, of the canes. Mounding the base of the plant with extra soil and mulching in the fall can provide extra protection. If a plant is grafted, the bud union should be placed 2″ – 4″ below the soil surface when planting (not necessary when using the Minnesota Tip). This will provide additional protection for the bud union and may also result in the plant growing roots from the area above the graft – turning the plant own rooted – which is generally desirable for roses in colder climates.

Natural Hardiness

Popularity and availability of the hardier roses has grown in recent years. Successfully choosing varieties for colder climates requires some understanding of how cold hardiness relates to the various classes of roses. It is important to note that within even the most hardy classes of roses, there are some particular varieties that are more cold hardy and others that are more tender. The tenderness is often attributed to the amount of china or tea in their genetic makeup.

In the North Central District, hardy roses come from two general classes – Old Garden Roses and Shrub Roses. Generally OGR classes of Alba, Centifolia, Damask, Hybrid Perpetual (best in sheltered locations), Gallica and some of the Moss, Species and Species Hybrid roses are considered Minnesota zone 4 hardy. Most Alba and Centifolia roses are zone 3 hardy. Shrub classes of Kordesii and Hybrid Rugosa are generally zone 3 hardy. The Shrub subclass contains roses of varying degrees of hardiness. Polyanthas are often considered dieback hardy. Growers in the warmer portions of the North Central District, zone 5, find that they can grow the English roses, the Hybrid Musks, and even some of the Bourbons, with a minimum of winter protection. However, for most of the district, growing zones 3 and 4, we find that these perform better with significant winter cover – including the Minnesota Tip method.

Hardy Old Garden Roses for Our District

SPECIES AND SPECIES HYBRIDS: Species roses are those that occur naturally in the wild. Some of these spring/early summer bloomers are outstanding.

GALLICA: These roses can be traced back to the Greeks and Romans, who brought them to England and France. They are some of the oldest roses in existence. Gallicas bloom once heavily in the spring, on shorter, bushy plants, with flowers that are red, deep pink, mauve, striped or splashed with spots. The fragrance is intense and spicy.

ALBA: Albas were introduced by Roman traders before 77 A.D. These are tall, hardy, spring-blooming roses. The flowers have light, sophisticated fragrances, and are generally semi-double to double, pink or white. Foliage is grey-green, disease resistant, and shade tolerant.

DAMASK: These roses date back to biblical times, referred to by Pliny in ancient Rome and Virgil in 50 B.C. The arching canes are smaller in diameter than those on the Gallicas, but make taller plants. Flowers, often in clusters, are semi-double to double, white to deep pink, borne on short peduncles with intense, unusual fragrance. Autumn Damasks are known for repeat bloom in the fall, though it rarely occurs in the colder climates.

CENTIFOLIA: Known as cabbage or Provence roses, often depicted in old Dutch paintings, these intensely fragrant roses bloom once, generally later than other spring blooming types. They are a hardy Alba-Damask hybrid with thorny arching canes and white to deep pink flowers.

MOSS: A fragrant sport of the Centifolias, these roses have moss-like growth on the sepals which exudes a sticky substance having a balsam scent. Some will repeat bloom.

HYBRID PERPETUAL: These roses were first recognized in Queen Victoria’s time. They have good June bloom with lighter repeat bloom later. Blooms are reds, pinks, whites and mixes, and are often quite fragrant. Some winter dieback is common, mulching or careful site selection is advised for best success. Lightly prune after spring bloom to encourage later summer bloom.

Hardy Shrub Roses for Our District

RUGOSA ROSES: These are the most shade, drought and poor condition tolerant roses. They have bright green heavily textured foliage that is disease resistant and that dislikes chemical sprays. These shrubs, with repeat bloom, come in reds, mauves, pinks and white. The plants have attractive hips in the fall.

EXPLORER SERIES/OTTAWA AGRICULTURE RESEARCH STATION, CANADA: Many of these roses have Rugosa roses in their genetic development which gives them extra hardiness and additional disease resistance. Included in these roses is the first truly hardy climber, William Baffin.

PARKLAND SERIES/MORDEN RESEARCH STATION, MORDEN, MANITOBA, CANADA: These are hardy roses with exceptional summer repeat bloom, especially if given attention similar to that which we give our tender repeat bloomers. Some have flowers that are similar to those of the tender Hybrid Teas and Floribundas.

DR. GRIFFITH BUCK/IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES, IOWA: Buck roses are complex hybrids of Species roses, Shrub roses, early English roses, Hybrid Teas and Grandifloras. The hardiness varies considerably. These roses were developed to be hardy in zone 5. Many of them can be considered dieback hardy in zone 4. More of these are becoming commercially available today. Eighty-seven of the Buck varieties have been registered with the ARS as of 1997.

OTHER TYPES: There are a number of other roses that have been introduced, such as the Meidiland roses and David Austin’s English roses. Most of these will perform best with winter protection, including the Minnesota Tip, in zones 3 and 4. Growers in zone 5 will grow these and also the Hybrid Musks and some of the Bourbons with less protection. Some others, like the shrubs Nevada and Lillian Gibson, are hardy in all of the North Central District zones

American Rose Society